Sat 27 Nov 2010 12:47:49 PM UTC, comment #18:
I confirm that your monitor is not detected as an LCD and does not support 70Hz at 1280*1024. I have no solution right now.
Indeed I read the xresprobe script and it guesses CRT/LCD screen only using the existence of a digital video input. But many old LCD screen don't have this entry. Maybe we could use an additional guess based on screen width÷height ratio. It is 4/3 for CRT and often anything else for LCD. Of course some older LCD screen may also have a 4/3 ratio…
|
Thu 25 Nov 2010 10:18:12 AM UTC, comment #17:
I think there is also a potential mistake in Xorg configuration. I limited horizontal sync to the range 70-75 so it may happen that some screen do not fit at all. I should switch to a larger range, for example 70-90.
|
Wed 24 Nov 2010 05:30:26 AM UTC, comment #16:
I tried at another PC with the same monitor and result is positive.
It is really annoying but the problem is wider - we cannot predict how the system will look like at the most known PC configurations because we do not have a testing scenario and thus cannot run it!
I submitted hw report from this positive PC. Will be able to do the same from my PC in an hour (virus attack).
|
Tue 23 Nov 2010 08:37:00 AM UTC, comment #15:
I think the problem is that your monitor is not detected as an LCD monitor and it does not support a 70Hz refresh rate at 1280×1024 (a limit which is added for CRT monitors not to blink). Could you please send me the hardware report for your configuration using the new tool in “Settings → System”? If you're connected to the Internet you'll be able to post the report directly to Gna.
NB: is it really annoying to have 1152×864 instead of 1280×1024?
|
Tue 23 Nov 2010 06:43:40 AM UTC, comment #14:
Not exactly.
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1152 x 864, maximum 1152 x 1152
VGA-0 connected 1152x864+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 376mm x 301mm
1152x864 75.0*
1024x768 74.9 70.1
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 74.9
640x480 75.0 72.8 75.0 74.8
720x400 70.1
|
Thu 04 Nov 2010 03:23:36 PM UTC, comment #13:
More and more strange, your Xorg.conf looks good, it has the following line:
Modes "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" "400x300" "320x240"
Could you type the following command in the console to list all available resolutions:
$ xrandr
You should get something like this:
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1680
VGA connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 474mm x 296mm
1680x1050 60.0+ 60.0 60.0
1600x1200 60.0 59.9
1600x1024 60.0
1400x1050 74.8 70.0 60.0 60.0
1280x1024 75.0 59.9 60.0
1440x900 60.2 59.9
1280x960 60.0 59.9
[…]
Maybe 1280x1024 is not available at a refreshing rate greater than 70 Hz?
|
Mon 01 Nov 2010 07:02:58 AM UTC, comment #12:
Here it is again
(file #11041)
|
Fri 29 Oct 2010 10:55:57 AM UTC, comment #11:
Strange, could you send your file “/etc/X11/xorg.conf”?
|
Fri 29 Oct 2010 05:34:16 AM UTC, comment #10:
Does not fixed in 28/10/2010 build
|
Mon 25 Oct 2010 05:23:52 AM UTC, comment #9:
Agree!
|
Fri 22 Oct 2010 11:58:22 AM UTC, comment #8:
I'll change the limit in next Russian build I'll upload within days and you'll tell me, it's simpler!
|
Fri 22 Oct 2010 04:06:52 AM UTC, comment #7:
this one does not work again
|
Thu 21 Oct 2010 08:13:00 AM UTC, comment #6:
Ok my command line was wrong, I used the multiply character instead of the X character… Try this command instead, which looks identical but is not:
$ sudo sed -i 's/"1152x864"/"1280x1024" "1152x864"/' /etc/X11/xorg.conf
It should lead you to 1280×1024. If it succeeds, please tell what you think about the size of the icons on the desktop and the empty space left. When I had 1600×1200 on my CRT they were very small and there was a lot of empty space.
Another alternative to solve the issue is to remove screen resolution limit and patch lxlauncher to have it change the icon size relatively to screen size (but lxpanel icons cannot be enlarged without being patched too I think). Honestly I have strictly no idea of the difficulty of this task.
|
Wed 20 Oct 2010 11:30:55 AM UTC, comment #5:
Could you send me your file “/etc/X11/xorg.conf”? I would like to check if resolution is written inside or not.
|
Wed 20 Oct 2010 09:34:09 AM UTC, comment #4:
I did it and this produce no results
|
Wed 20 Oct 2010 08:39:47 AM UTC, comment #3:
OK I think your LCD screen is not detected as an LCD screen. I've already seen this happening. Indeed I added screen resolution limits because X server defaults to use the largest detected one (I think that's what Qimo does). So at home on my 19" CRT, it uses a very high 1600×1280 resolution which make icons and text very small. Currently the algorithm I added is quite simple:
if LCD detected
use native resolution
else
if monitor/card supports vertical refresh ≥ 70 Hz
force the use of a vertical refresh ≥ 70 Hz
add resolutions ≤ 1152×864
The test against vertical refresh frequency permits to avoid screen blinking, which tires eyes (this gives me headaches). In the future we could replace the static 1152×864 limit with a computation of physical screen resolution (dot/inch) but trials are required to find how undetected LCD displays can get their native resolution from computation…
As a workaround, if you feel that most Russian people have LCD screen, it is possible to remove the resolution limit or to increase it to 1280×1024, at least on the Russian version. You can test it on a running DoudouLinux system. Type the following in the console:
$ sudo sed -i 's/"1152×864"/"1280×1024" "1152×864"/' /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Then press Ctrl+Alt+Backspace or close the session to restart X.
|
Wed 20 Oct 2010 02:18:51 AM UTC, comment #2:
I use LCD as the most people in Russia.
I checked Qimo 2.0 Desktop OS for kids and it deals with 1280*1024 fine
|
Tue 19 Oct 2010 10:17:53 AM UTC, comment #1:
What kind of monitor do you have, CRT, LCD?
DoudouLinux tries to set a resolution below 1152×864 for CRT screens because the interface is to small on higher resolutions. On the contrary on LCD screens it should let the system use the native LCD resolution whatever it is because it would otherwise lead to a blurring effect. But sometimes LCD detection does not work…
|
Tue 19 Oct 2010 03:54:47 AM UTC, original submission:
Max screen resolution 1152864 produce not good picture at my 19 inches monitor. The best for my monitor is 12801024 which is absent in a list of available resolutions
|