bugFreeciv - Bugs: bug #24886, README.classic

 
 
Show feedback again

bug #24886: README.classic

Submitted by:  Frank <dunnoob>
Submitted on:  Thu Jul 28 12:07:58 2016  
 
Category: NoneSeverity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - NormalStatus: None
Assigned to: NoneOpen/Closed: Open
Release: 2.6Operating System: None
Planned Release: Contains string changes: None

Add a New Comment (Rich MarkupRich Markup):
   

You are not logged in

Please log in, so followups can be emailed to you.

 

(Jump to the original submission Jump to the original submission)

Thu Jul 28 22:48:55 2016, comment #7:

Yeah, what I said in bug #24866 was that
1) Current trunk README.classic is NOT suitable for S2_6 as its point of view are changes relative to the default, and in S2_6 there's no differences between the default and classic.
2) What ever other text we add to new S2_6 README.classic should most likely be added to existing trunk README.classic too.

Further, one should also consider what parts fit better to translable summary than to untranslated long description that README.classic gets used as.

Marko Lindqvist <cazfi>
Project Administrator
Thu Jul 28 22:38:01 2016, comment #6:

Reboot at bug #24866: somebody, e.g. me, should create a README.classic also for 2.6

Rationale, classic is a first class ruleset and deserves to have a nice README like alien + civ2civ3.

If the server knows what to load as default ruleset even without a default.serv it's an interesting fact deserving to be documented elsewhere, e.g., on the Wiki, where I claimed that this is determined by default.serv on several pages. :-P

Frank <dunnoob>
Thu Jul 28 22:25:28 2016, comment #5:

The data/default.serv is really not the most important part of it. More importantly the default is what the server loads automatically when no .serv file is being used.

That short text would better fit to ruleset summary (shown also in the server side), still no need to have it in description, and even less to read it from separate file. That's how those existing files are used; game.ruleset includes them for showing them in Help -> About Ruleset.

Marko Lindqvist <cazfi>
Project Administrator
Thu Jul 28 22:18:50 2016, comment #4:

EAGAIN, giving up, suggested text:

In this Freeciv version the classic ruleset is still the default determined by file data/default.serv; for version 3.0 the civ2civ3 ruleset will be the default.

Frank <dunnoob>
Thu Jul 28 22:15:48 2016, comment #3:

EAGAIN, maybe -Verbatim- requires a blank line:

Frank <dunnoob>
Thu Jul 28 22:10:30 2016, comment #2:

You said that a README.classic for 2.6 would be the same as README.classic for 3.0 in bug #24866, but no matter what it contains, 2.6 should have a README.classic like it has a README.alien and a README.civ2civ3.

It doesn't need to be long, one simple statement will do:
Perfectly in line with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment

Frank <dunnoob>
Thu Jul 28 18:23:36 2016, comment #1:

> adding the existing trunk/data/classic/README.classic also to the 2.6 branch,


No. Existing README.classic is about differences between the default (civ2civ3) ruleset and classic. In S2_6 there's no differences whatsoever between classic and the default, since classic IS the default there.

Marko Lindqvist <cazfi>
Project Administrator
Thu Jul 28 12:07:58 2016, original submission:

Based on bug #24866 adding README.classic boils down to adding the existing trunk/data/classic/README.classic also to the 2.6 branch, and repeat the bug #24866 patch for data/classic/game.ruleset in 2.6.

Frank <dunnoob>

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 1024 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach File(s):
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -unavailable- added by cazfi (Posted a comment)
  • -unavailable- added by dunnoob (Submitted the item)
  •  

    Do you think this task is very important?
    If so, you can click here to add your encouragement to it.
    This task has 0 encouragements so far.

    Only logged-in users can vote.

     

    Error: not logged in

     

     

    No Changes Have Been Made to This Item
    Show feedback again

    Back to the top


    Powered by Savane 3.1-cleanup