newsNews: Announce: DNSbl (RBLs) in use at

Show feedback again
Latest News
mail subsystem upgraded posted by beuc, Sat 23 May 2015 06:17:18 PM UTC - 0 replies
dl/home/cvs/svn/ upgraded to debian8 posted by beuc, Thu 21 May 2015 10:12:23 PM UTC - 1 reply SSL certificate renewed posted by zerodeux, Thu 24 Apr 2014 07:13:06 AM UTC - 0 replies
Heartbleed status and measures posted by beuc, Wed 09 Apr 2014 09:47:29 AM UTC - 0 replies
mail subsystem automatically reinstalled posted by beuc, Sat 08 Mar 2014 11:02:17 PM UTC - 0 replies
[124 news in archive]

Announce: DNSbl (RBLs) in use at

Item posted by Mathieu Roy <yeupou> on Fri 26 Nov 2004 09:35:09 AM UTC.

In order to fight spam more accurately, since this month, relies on DNS blacklist to refuse to carry mails from obviously seriously misconfigured or dishonnest SMTPs. This is not completely new as spamassassin was, in past, using these blacklists to tag mails.

When a mail is found to be sent from a blacklisted host, it is rejected during the SMTP transaction. Unlike spam filtering via spamassassin (which is still effective at for accepted mails), the filtering is not done by tagging a previously accepted mail. It saves us CPU time, since we do not have to run anything to study the content of the mail sent. It let the faulty originator SMTP to deal with its own crap. use several different blacklists: it uses, and (excluding case).
The way we use these blacklists block only seriously broken SMTPs or dishonnests SMTP - we do not block personal SMTPs, SMTPs behind endusers IP blocks.

At the following addresses, you can read documentation about the way SMTPs are added to these lists:

If the SMTP you use is there, write to person in charge of the SMTP so it gets removed from the blacklists (rejection messages include relevant information about the blacklisting) or use another SMTP. Several SMTP of (a major French ISP), for instance, are blacklisted (at rfc-ignorant). It is a pity for users but it is not an option for us to accept mail from seriously broken SMTPs. Unless one can prove that the blacklist we use had no valid reason to blacklist an SMTP, the only solution is to get the SMTP fixed.
One should be able to expect his/her ISP to provide well configured SMTP servers.


Message: 151
RE: Note (posted by yeupou, Fri 17 Dec 2004 04:27:46 PM UTC)


We now rely on abuse and postmaster at rfc-ignorant only for spam tagging. Only and are currently used for spam rejection.

The other lists use at rejection time could cause too easily false positive. Enforcing good practices that helps fighting spam cannot be done that far in the current situation.

Relevant "discussion":

Thread Author Date
NoteyeupouSun 12 Dec 2004 12:43:09 PM UTC
      RE: NoteyeupouFri 17 Dec 2004 04:27:46 PM UTC


Post a followup to this message

You could post if you were logged in
Show feedback again

Back to the top

Powered by Savane 3.1-cleanup